China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)
China, Hong Kong SAR
-0.1398 % change on previous year
in 2024
Latvia
-0.1771 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
139th
Latvia rank
141st
Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Latvia
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -0.1398 % change on previous year against -0.1771 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0.0373 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 139th and Latvia ranks 141st of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.29 % change on previous year | -12.63 % change on previous year | 19.93 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2000s | 2.62 % change on previous year | 1.29 % change on previous year | 1.33 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 10.7 % change on previous year | 1.33 % change on previous year | 9.37 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | -5.2 % change on previous year | -0.1879 % change on previous year | 5.01 % change on previous year | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), China, Hong Kong SAR or Latvia?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at -0.1398 % change on previous year against -0.1771 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 0.0373 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia rank globally for livestock — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 139th and Latvia ranks 141st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Livestock — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.