Latvia vs Libya: Livestock — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Latvia
106.86
in 2024
Libya
106.4
in 2024
Latvia rank
61st
Libya rank
64th
Livestock — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100) over time
- Latvia
- Libya
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 106.86 against 106.4 in Libya, a difference of 0.46.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 61st and Libya ranks 64th of 184 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 96.76 | 115.33 | 18.57 | Libya |
| 2000s | 73.56 | 115.79 | 42.22 | Libya |
| 2010s | 96.36 | 111.21 | 14.85 | Libya |
| 2020s | 106.77 | 107.5 | 0.728 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher livestock — gross per capita production index number, Latvia or Libya?
- Latvia, at 106.86 against 106.4 in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in livestock — gross per capita production index number between Latvia and Libya?
- 0.46, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Libya?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Libya rank globally for livestock — gross per capita production index number?
- Latvia ranks 61st and Libya ranks 64th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Livestock — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.