Eswatini vs Pakistan: Lemons and limes — Production, per unit of GDP
Eswatini
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2006
Pakistan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eswatini rank
45th
Pakistan rank
47th
Lemons and limes — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Eswatini
- Pakistan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Pakistan, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Pakistan ahead.
Eswatini ranks 45th and Pakistan ranks 47th of 114 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lemons and limes — production, per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Pakistan?
- Eswatini, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Pakistan as of 2006.
- What is the difference in lemons and limes — production, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Pakistan?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Pakistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2006.
- How do Eswatini and Pakistan rank globally for lemons and limes — production, per unit of gdp?
- Eswatini ranks 45th and Pakistan ranks 47th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Lemons and limes — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Lemons and limes — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.