China vs Saudi Arabia: Lemons and limes — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
China
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
72nd
Saudi Arabia rank
74th
Lemons and limes — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
China currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Saudi Arabia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
China ranks 72nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 74th of 113 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lemons and limes — area harvested, per unit of gdp, China or Saudi Arabia?
- China, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in lemons and limes — area harvested, per unit of gdp between China and Saudi Arabia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Saudi Arabia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do China and Saudi Arabia rank globally for lemons and limes — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 72nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 74th of 113 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Lemons and limes — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Lemons and limes — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.