Australia vs Malta: Lemons and limes — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Australia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malta
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Australia rank
81st
Malta rank
83rd
Lemons and limes — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Australia
- Malta
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malta, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 81st and Malta ranks 83rd of 113 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lemons and limes — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Australia or Malta?
- Australia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in lemons and limes — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Australia and Malta?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malta?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Malta rank globally for lemons and limes — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Australia ranks 81st and Malta ranks 83rd of 113 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Lemons and limes — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Lemons and limes — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.