Azerbaijan vs Malta: Lemons and limes — Area harvested, per capita
Azerbaijan
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Malta
0.0001 ha per person
in 2017
Azerbaijan rank
71st
Malta rank
69th
Lemons and limes — Area harvested, per capita over time
- Azerbaijan
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 71st and Malta ranks 69th of 113 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Malta |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lemons and limes — area harvested, per capita, Azerbaijan or Malta?
- Malta, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Azerbaijan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in lemons and limes — area harvested, per capita between Azerbaijan and Malta?
- 0 ha per person, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Malta?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
- How do Azerbaijan and Malta rank globally for lemons and limes — area harvested, per capita?
- Azerbaijan ranks 71st and Malta ranks 69th of 113 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Lemons and limes — Area harvested, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Lemons and limes — Area harvested divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.