Hungary vs Saudi Arabia: Land use vs. yield change in cereal production
Hungary
85
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
86
in 2014
Hungary rank
106th
Saudi Arabia rank
105th
Land use vs. yield change in cereal production over time
- Hungary
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 86 against 85 in Hungary, a difference of 1.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Hungary ranks 106th and Saudi Arabia ranks 105th of 147 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 97.78 | 112.22 | 14.44 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1970s | 93.3 | 129.4 | 36.1 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1980s | 86.4 | 204.5 | 118.1 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 84.3 | 315 | 230.7 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 87.2 | 217.9 | 130.7 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 82.4 | 84.2 | 1.8 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land use vs. yield change in cereal production, Hungary or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 86 against 85 in Hungary as of 2014.
- What is the difference in land use vs. yield change in cereal production between Hungary and Saudi Arabia?
- 1, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Saudi Arabia?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2014.
- How do Hungary and Saudi Arabia rank globally for land use vs. yield change in cereal production?
- Hungary ranks 106th and Saudi Arabia ranks 105th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Land use vs. yield change in cereal production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indexed change in land used for cereal production versus cereal yields, from 1961 to 2014. Both indexes are measured relative to values in 1961 (i.e. 1961 = 100).