Eswatini vs Switzerland: Land use vs. yield change in cereal production
Eswatini
83
in 2014
Switzerland
80
in 2014
Eswatini rank
108th
Switzerland rank
111th
Land use vs. yield change in cereal production over time
- Eswatini
- Switzerland
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 83 against 80 in Switzerland, a difference of 3.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.
Eswatini ranks 108th and Switzerland ranks 111th of 147 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 91.56 | 96.89 | 5.33 | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 70.7 | 97.4 | 26.7 | Switzerland |
| 1980s | 72.1 | 102.3 | 30.2 | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 64.4 | 110.3 | 45.9 | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 55.7 | 92 | 36.3 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 69.2 | 81.6 | 12.4 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land use vs. yield change in cereal production, Eswatini or Switzerland?
- Eswatini, at 83 against 80 in Switzerland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in land use vs. yield change in cereal production between Eswatini and Switzerland?
- 3, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Switzerland?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Switzerland rank globally for land use vs. yield change in cereal production?
- Eswatini ranks 108th and Switzerland ranks 111th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Land use vs. yield change in cereal production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indexed change in land used for cereal production versus cereal yields, from 1961 to 2014. Both indexes are measured relative to values in 1961 (i.e. 1961 = 100).