Eswatini vs Saudi Arabia: Land use vs. yield change in cereal production
Eswatini
83
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
86
in 2014
Eswatini rank
108th
Saudi Arabia rank
105th
Land use vs. yield change in cereal production over time
- Eswatini
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 86 against 83 in Eswatini, a difference of 3.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 108th and Saudi Arabia ranks 105th of 147 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 91.56 | 112.22 | 20.67 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1970s | 70.7 | 129.4 | 58.7 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1980s | 72.1 | 204.5 | 132.4 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 64.4 | 315 | 250.6 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 55.7 | 217.9 | 162.2 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 69.2 | 84.2 | 15 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land use vs. yield change in cereal production, Eswatini or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 86 against 83 in Eswatini as of 2014.
- What is the difference in land use vs. yield change in cereal production between Eswatini and Saudi Arabia?
- 3, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Saudi Arabia?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Saudi Arabia rank globally for land use vs. yield change in cereal production?
- Eswatini ranks 108th and Saudi Arabia ranks 105th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Land use vs. yield change in cereal production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indexed change in land used for cereal production versus cereal yields, from 1961 to 2014. Both indexes are measured relative to values in 1961 (i.e. 1961 = 100).