El Salvador vs Philippines: Land use vs. yield change in cereal production
El Salvador
136
in 2014
Philippines
141
in 2014
El Salvador rank
61st
Philippines rank
59th
Land use vs. yield change in cereal production over time
- El Salvador
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 141 against 136 in El Salvador, a difference of 5.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.
El Salvador ranks 61st and Philippines ranks 59th of 147 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 4 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 104.11 | 101.89 | 2.22 | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 125.5 | 123.3 | 2.2 | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 133.3 | 130.6 | 2.7 | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 146.7 | 126.6 | 20.1 | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 116.6 | 129.1 | 12.5 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 128.4 | 138 | 9.6 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land use vs. yield change in cereal production, El Salvador or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 141 against 136 in El Salvador as of 2014.
- What is the difference in land use vs. yield change in cereal production between El Salvador and Philippines?
- 5, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Philippines?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2014.
- How do El Salvador and Philippines rank globally for land use vs. yield change in cereal production?
- El Salvador ranks 61st and Philippines ranks 59th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Land use vs. yield change in cereal production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indexed change in land used for cereal production versus cereal yields, from 1961 to 2014. Both indexes are measured relative to values in 1961 (i.e. 1961 = 100).