Côte d'Ivoire vs Rwanda: Land use vs. yield change in cereal production
Côte d'Ivoire
284
in 2014
Rwanda
281
in 2014
Côte d'Ivoire rank
19th
Rwanda rank
20th
Land use vs. yield change in cereal production over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Rwanda
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 284 against 281 in Rwanda, a difference of 3.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 147 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 132.56 | 99.33 | 33.22 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1970s | 192.8 | 134.3 | 58.5 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1980s | 239.4 | 160.3 | 79.1 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | 219 | 124.7 | 94.3 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 164.4 | 210.7 | 46.3 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 230.2 | 270 | 39.8 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land use vs. yield change in cereal production, Côte d'Ivoire or Rwanda?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 284 against 281 in Rwanda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in land use vs. yield change in cereal production between Côte d'Ivoire and Rwanda?
- 3, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Rwanda?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2014.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Rwanda rank globally for land use vs. yield change in cereal production?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Land use vs. yield change in cereal production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indexed change in land used for cereal production versus cereal yields, from 1961 to 2014. Both indexes are measured relative to values in 1961 (i.e. 1961 = 100).