Australia vs Sierra Leone: Land use vs. yield change in cereal production
Australia
213
in 2014
Sierra Leone
218
in 2014
Australia rank
34th
Sierra Leone rank
32nd
Land use vs. yield change in cereal production over time
- Australia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 218 against 213 in Australia, a difference of 5.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Australia ranks 34th and Sierra Leone ranks 32nd of 147 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 127.22 | 103 | 24.22 | Australia |
| 1970s | 153 | 127.2 | 25.8 | Australia |
| 1980s | 188.3 | 132 | 56.3 | Australia |
| 1990s | 171.7 | 122.6 | 49.1 | Australia |
| 2000s | 226.6 | 169.9 | 56.7 | Australia |
| 2010s | 222.2 | 231 | 8.8 | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land use vs. yield change in cereal production, Australia or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 218 against 213 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in land use vs. yield change in cereal production between Australia and Sierra Leone?
- 5, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sierra Leone?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Sierra Leone rank globally for land use vs. yield change in cereal production?
- Australia ranks 34th and Sierra Leone ranks 32nd of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Land use vs. yield change in cereal production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indexed change in land used for cereal production versus cereal yields, from 1961 to 2014. Both indexes are measured relative to values in 1961 (i.e. 1961 = 100).