Eritrea vs Zambia: Land under millet production
Eritrea
55,286 hectares
in 2011
Zambia
39,282 hectares
in 2011
Eritrea rank
23rd
Zambia rank
25th
Land under millet production over time
- Eritrea
- Zambia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 55,286 hectares against 39,282 hectares in Zambia, a difference of 16,004 hectares.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.4 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 23rd and Zambia ranks 25th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 73,947 hectares | 79,570 hectares | 5,623 hectares | Zambia |
| 2000s | 70,616 hectares | 52,820 hectares | 17,795 hectares | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 55,415 hectares | 45,044 hectares | 10,371 hectares | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land under millet production, Eritrea or Zambia?
- Eritrea, at 55,286 hectares against 39,282 hectares in Zambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in land under millet production between Eritrea and Zambia?
- 16,004 hectares, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Zambia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Zambia rank globally for land under millet production?
- Eritrea ranks 23rd and Zambia ranks 25th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as Land under millet production (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land under millet production refers to harvested area, although some countries report only sown or cultivated area. Production data on relate to crop harvested for dry grain only. Crop harvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed, or silage and those used for grazing are excluded.