Congo vs South Africa: Land under millet production
Congo
13,500 hectares
in 2011
South Africa
14,000 hectares
in 2011
Congo rank
30th
South Africa rank
29th
Land under millet production over time
- Congo
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 14,000 hectares against 13,500 hectares in Congo, a difference of 500 hectares.
Across all 11 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 29th of 37 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,405 hectares | 15,886 hectares | 4,481 hectares | South Africa |
| 2010s | 13,250 hectares | 14,050 hectares | 800 hectares | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land under millet production, Congo or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 14,000 hectares against 13,500 hectares in Congo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in land under millet production between Congo and South Africa?
- 500 hectares, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Africa?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2011.
- How do Congo and South Africa rank globally for land under millet production?
- Congo ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 29th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as Land under millet production (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land under millet production refers to harvested area, although some countries report only sown or cultivated area. Production data on relate to crop harvested for dry grain only. Crop harvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed, or silage and those used for grazing are excluded.