Australia vs United States of America: Land under cereal production

Australia
19.46 million hectares
in 2024
United States of America
54.08 million hectares
in 2024
Australia rank
6th
United States of America rank
3rd

Land under cereal production over time

  • Australia
  • United States of America
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196119922024

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 54.08 million hectares against 19.46 million hectares in Australia, a difference of 34.62 million hectares.

That makes United States of America's figure about 2.8 times Australia's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 6th and United States of America ranks 3rd of 181 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 10.75 million hectares 62.05 million hectares 51.30 million hectares United States of America
1970s 12.91 million hectares 66.72 million hectares 53.81 million hectares United States of America
1980s 15.89 million hectares 67.46 million hectares 51.57 million hectares United States of America
1990s 14.49 million hectares 62.65 million hectares 48.16 million hectares United States of America
2000s 19.13 million hectares 57.24 million hectares 38.10 million hectares United States of America
2010s 17.88 million hectares 56.78 million hectares 38.91 million hectares United States of America
2020s 18.56 million hectares 53.62 million hectares 35.06 million hectares United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production, Australia or United States of America?
United States of America, at 54.08 million hectares against 19.46 million hectares in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in land under cereal production between Australia and United States of America?
34.62 million hectares, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United States of America?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and United States of America rank globally for land under cereal production?
Australia ranks 6th and United States of America ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Land under cereal production (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs United States of America: Land under cereal production. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares/australia/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares/australia/united-states/">Australia vs United States of America: Land under cereal production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares)
Unit
hectares
Source
FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
228 places, 13,401 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production refers to harvested area, although some countries report only sown or cultivated area. Cereals include wheat, rice, maize, barley, oats, rye, millet, sorghum, buckwheat, and mixed grains. Production data on cereals relate to crops harvested for dry grain only. Cereal crops harvested for hay or harvested green for food, feed, or silage and those used for grazing are excluded.