Iceland vs Oman: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP
Iceland
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Oman
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Iceland rank
160th
Oman rank
163rd
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP over time
- Iceland
- Oman
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Oman, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.4 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 160th and Oman ranks 163rd of 178 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp, Iceland or Oman?
- Iceland, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Oman as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp between Iceland and Oman?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Oman?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Oman rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
- Iceland ranks 160th and Oman ranks 163rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.