Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Tanzania: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tanzania
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
23rd
Tanzania rank
22nd

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Tanzania
0000.001196119922024

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 12.0 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 23rd and Tanzania ranks 22nd of 47 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Tanzania Difference Ahead
1980s 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP Tanzania
1990s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2000s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2010s 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2020s 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Tanzania?
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Tanzania?
36 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Tanzania rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 23rd and Tanzania ranks 22nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Tanzania: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/tanzania/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Tanzania: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.