Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Myanmar: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Myanmar
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
16th
Myanmar rank
17th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Myanmar
00.0050.010.015196119922024

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 6.3 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 38 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 16th and Myanmar ranks 17th of 47 groups.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Myanmar Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.003 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0029 hectares per US$ of GDP Myanmar
1990s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0016 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0015 hectares per US$ of GDP Myanmar
2000s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP Myanmar
2010s 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Myanmar
2020s 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Myanmar?
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Myanmar?
38 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Myanmar rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 16th and Myanmar ranks 17th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Myanmar: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/myanmar/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Myanmar: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.