Democratic Republic of Congo vs World: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
World
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
27th
World rank
29th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • World
00000196119922024

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in World, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 17.9 times World's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was World ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 27th and World ranks 29th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 6 and World in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo World Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP World
1970s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
1980s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
1990s 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp, Democratic Republic of Congo or World?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in World as of 2024.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp between Democratic Republic of Congo and World?
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and World?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and World rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 27th and World ranks 29th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs World: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/world/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs World: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.