Democratic Republic of Congo vs Ethiopia: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ethiopia
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
27th
Ethiopia rank
24th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Ethiopia
00.0010.0020.003196119922024

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 27th and Ethiopia ranks 24th of 178 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0029 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0027 hectares per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
1970s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0013 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
1980s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
1990s 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2000s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2010s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2020s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp, Democratic Republic of Congo or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp between Democratic Republic of Congo and Ethiopia?
0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Ethiopia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Ethiopia rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 27th and Ethiopia ranks 24th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Ethiopia: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/ethiopia/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Ethiopia: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.