Central African Republic vs Myanmar: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP

Central African Republic
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Myanmar
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
14th
Myanmar rank
17th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Myanmar
00.0050.010.015196119922024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Myanmar, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.3 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 14th and Myanmar ranks 17th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0109 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.01 hectares per US$ of GDP Myanmar
1970s 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0063 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0058 hectares per US$ of GDP Myanmar
1980s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0037 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0035 hectares per US$ of GDP Myanmar
1990s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0016 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0015 hectares per US$ of GDP Myanmar
2000s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP Myanmar
2010s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Myanmar
2020s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp, Central African Republic or Myanmar?
Central African Republic, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp between Central African Republic and Myanmar?
0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Myanmar rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
Central African Republic ranks 14th and Myanmar ranks 17th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Myanmar: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/myanmar/">Central African Republic vs Myanmar: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.