Central African Republic vs IDA blend: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP

Central African Republic
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
IDA blend
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
14th
IDA blend rank
15th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP over time

  • Central African Republic
  • IDA blend
00.0010.0010.002196119922024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in IDA blend, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 7.4 times IDA blend's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was IDA blend ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 14th and IDA blend ranks 15th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and IDA blend in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic IDA blend Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0014 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP IDA blend
1970s 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP IDA blend
1980s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
1990s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP IDA blend
2000s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
2010s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
2020s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp, Central African Republic or IDA blend?
Central African Republic, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in IDA blend as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp between Central African Republic and IDA blend?
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and IDA blend?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and IDA blend rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
Central African Republic ranks 14th and IDA blend ranks 15th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs IDA blend: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/ida-blend/">Central African Republic vs IDA blend: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.