Cambodia vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP

Cambodia
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cambodia rank
20th
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
23rd

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP over time

  • Cambodia
  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
00.0010.0010.0020.002197519992024

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 13.3 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 20th and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 23rd of 178 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0013 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0012 hectares per US$ of GDP Cambodia
1990s 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP Cambodia
2000s 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP Cambodia
2010s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Cambodia
2020s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp, Cambodia or Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Cambodia, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp between Cambodia and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
36 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
Cambodia ranks 20th and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 23rd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/cambodia/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/cambodia/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Cambodia vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.