Burundi vs Pre-demographic dividend: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP

Burundi
0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Pre-demographic dividend
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Burundi rank
5th
Pre-demographic dividend rank
6th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP over time

  • Burundi
  • Pre-demographic dividend
00.0010.0010.002196119922024

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Burundi's figure about 4.7 times Pre-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pre-demographic dividend ahead.

Burundi ranks 5th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 6th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 4 and Pre-demographic dividend in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Pre-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0008 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0013 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
1970s 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
1980s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP Burundi
1990s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Pre-demographic dividend
2000s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP Burundi
2010s 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP Burundi
2020s 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp, Burundi or Pre-demographic dividend?
Burundi, at 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2024.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp between Burundi and Pre-demographic dividend?
0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Pre-demographic dividend?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Burundi and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
Burundi ranks 5th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 6th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Pre-demographic dividend: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/pre-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/pre-demographic-dividend/">Burundi vs Pre-demographic dividend: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP
Unit
hectares per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 12,530 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.