Brunei vs Iceland: Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP
Brunei
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Iceland
0 hectares per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Brunei rank
161st
Iceland rank
160th
Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP over time
- Brunei
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Brunei, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brunei ahead.
Brunei ranks 161st and Iceland ranks 160th of 178 countries.
Brunei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Brunei |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp, Brunei or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Brunei as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp between Brunei and Iceland?
- 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Iceland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Brunei and Iceland rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of gdp?
- Brunei ranks 161st and Iceland ranks 160th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.