Peru vs Trinidad and Tobago: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre

Peru
0.902 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.6487 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru rank
134th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
137th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre over time

  • Peru
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.902 hectares per square kilometre against 0.6487 hectares per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.2533 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.4 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Peru ranks 134th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 137th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 4 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6015 hectares per square kilometre 0.9823 hectares per square kilometre 0.3808 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.6439 hectares per square kilometre 1.27 hectares per square kilometre 0.6283 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.6487 hectares per square kilometre 0.6314 hectares per square kilometre 0.0173 hectares per square kilometre Peru
1990s 0.6546 hectares per square kilometre 1.04 hectares per square kilometre 0.3872 hectares per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.9078 hectares per square kilometre 0.6593 hectares per square kilometre 0.2485 hectares per square kilometre Peru
2010s 0.9683 hectares per square kilometre 0.7471 hectares per square kilometre 0.2212 hectares per square kilometre Peru
2020s 0.929 hectares per square kilometre 0.6625 hectares per square kilometre 0.2664 hectares per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre, Peru or Trinidad and Tobago?
Peru, at 0.902 hectares per square kilometre against 0.6487 hectares per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre between Peru and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.2533 hectares per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Peru and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre?
Peru ranks 134th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 137th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Trinidad and Tobago: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/peru/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/peru/trinidad-and-tobago/">Peru vs Trinidad and Tobago: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.