Mauritius vs Solomon Islands: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre

Mauritius
0.0646 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0.0517 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
167th
Solomon Islands rank
169th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Solomon Islands
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0646 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0517 hectares per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0129 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 167th and Solomon Islands ranks 169th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0904 hectares per square kilometre 0.0111 hectares per square kilometre 0.0793 hectares per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.2871 hectares per square kilometre 0.0448 hectares per square kilometre 0.2423 hectares per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.4067 hectares per square kilometre 0.0737 hectares per square kilometre 0.333 hectares per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.1248 hectares per square kilometre 0.0195 hectares per square kilometre 0.1053 hectares per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0271 hectares per square kilometre 0.0301 hectares per square kilometre 0.003 hectares per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 0.1179 hectares per square kilometre 0.0492 hectares per square kilometre 0.0687 hectares per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0542 hectares per square kilometre 0.0518 hectares per square kilometre 0.0025 hectares per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre, Mauritius or Solomon Islands?
Mauritius, at 0.0646 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0517 hectares per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre between Mauritius and Solomon Islands?
0.0129 hectares per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Solomon Islands rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 167th and Solomon Islands ranks 169th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Solomon Islands: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/solomon-islands/">Mauritius vs Solomon Islands: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.