Guinea-Bissau vs Tanzania: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
7.78 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
7.36 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
59th
Tanzania rank
60th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Tanzania
2468196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 7.78 hectares per square kilometre against 7.36 hectares per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 0.42 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 59th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 5 and Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 3.33 hectares per square kilometre 1.7 hectares per square kilometre 1.63 hectares per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1970s 3.61 hectares per square kilometre 2.41 hectares per square kilometre 1.2 hectares per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1980s 5.14 hectares per square kilometre 3.15 hectares per square kilometre 1.99 hectares per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 4.47 hectares per square kilometre 3.34 hectares per square kilometre 1.13 hectares per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 5.29 hectares per square kilometre 4.79 hectares per square kilometre 0.4947 hectares per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 5.56 hectares per square kilometre 6.74 hectares per square kilometre 1.17 hectares per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 7.33 hectares per square kilometre 7.54 hectares per square kilometre 0.2154 hectares per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Tanzania?
Guinea-Bissau, at 7.78 hectares per square kilometre against 7.36 hectares per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania?
0.42 hectares per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 59th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Tanzania: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/tanzania/">Guinea-Bissau vs Tanzania: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.