El Salvador vs Low income: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre

El Salvador
15.31 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income
4.94 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
31st
Low income rank
29th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Low income
510152025196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 15.31 hectares per square kilometre against 4.94 hectares per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 10.37 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 3.1 times Low income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 31st and Low income ranks 29th of 181 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Low income Difference Ahead
1960s 14.82 hectares per square kilometre 2.7 hectares per square kilometre 12.12 hectares per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 17.92 hectares per square kilometre 2.96 hectares per square kilometre 14.96 hectares per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 19.12 hectares per square kilometre 3.31 hectares per square kilometre 15.81 hectares per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 21.02 hectares per square kilometre 3.88 hectares per square kilometre 17.14 hectares per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 16.71 hectares per square kilometre 4.44 hectares per square kilometre 12.27 hectares per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 17.85 hectares per square kilometre 4.73 hectares per square kilometre 13.12 hectares per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 15.68 hectares per square kilometre 4.88 hectares per square kilometre 10.8 hectares per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Low income?
El Salvador, at 15.31 hectares per square kilometre against 4.94 hectares per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Low income?
10.37 hectares per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Low income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Low income rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 31st and Low income ranks 29th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Low income: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/low-income/">El Salvador vs Low income: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.