East Asia & Pacific vs Malawi: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific
7.12 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
21.68 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
13th
Malawi rank
15th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Malawi
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 21.68 hectares per square kilometre against 7.12 hectares per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 14.56 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 3.0 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 13th and Malawi ranks 15th of 47 groups.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 6.05 hectares per square kilometre 10.74 hectares per square kilometre 4.69 hectares per square kilometre Malawi
1970s 6.43 hectares per square kilometre 12.89 hectares per square kilometre 6.46 hectares per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 6.51 hectares per square kilometre 13.07 hectares per square kilometre 6.56 hectares per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 6.58 hectares per square kilometre 14.96 hectares per square kilometre 8.38 hectares per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 6.61 hectares per square kilometre 17.84 hectares per square kilometre 11.23 hectares per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 7.2 hectares per square kilometre 20.16 hectares per square kilometre 12.95 hectares per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 7.21 hectares per square kilometre 21.83 hectares per square kilometre 14.62 hectares per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific or Malawi?
Malawi, at 21.68 hectares per square kilometre against 7.12 hectares per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific and Malawi?
14.56 hectares per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Malawi?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Malawi rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 13th and Malawi ranks 15th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Malawi: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/malawi/">East Asia & Pacific vs Malawi: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.