Cote d'Ivoire vs Mozambique: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
4.45 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
4.24 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
85th
Mozambique rank
88th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Mozambique
12345196119922023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 4.45 hectares per square kilometre against 4.24 hectares per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.21 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 85th and Mozambique ranks 88th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 6 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 1.97 hectares per square kilometre 0.9569 hectares per square kilometre 1.01 hectares per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1970s 2.85 hectares per square kilometre 1.15 hectares per square kilometre 1.71 hectares per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 3.55 hectares per square kilometre 1.7 hectares per square kilometre 1.84 hectares per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 3.24 hectares per square kilometre 2.1 hectares per square kilometre 1.14 hectares per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 2.44 hectares per square kilometre 2.91 hectares per square kilometre 0.4733 hectares per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 3.96 hectares per square kilometre 3.05 hectares per square kilometre 0.9098 hectares per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 4.16 hectares per square kilometre 3.46 hectares per square kilometre 0.7005 hectares per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Mozambique?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 4.45 hectares per square kilometre against 4.24 hectares per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Mozambique?
0.21 hectares per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Mozambique rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 85th and Mozambique ranks 88th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Mozambique: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/mozambique/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Mozambique: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.