Congo vs Saudi Arabia: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre

Congo
0.1013 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0.1084 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
166th
Saudi Arabia rank
165th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Saudi Arabia
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.1084 hectares per square kilometre against 0.1013 hectares per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0071 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Congo ranks 166th and Saudi Arabia ranks 165th of 181 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0284 hectares per square kilometre 0.1427 hectares per square kilometre 0.1143 hectares per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1970s 0.0677 hectares per square kilometre 0.1647 hectares per square kilometre 0.097 hectares per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1980s 0.0595 hectares per square kilometre 0.2602 hectares per square kilometre 0.2007 hectares per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1990s 0.039 hectares per square kilometre 0.4009 hectares per square kilometre 0.3618 hectares per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.0768 hectares per square kilometre 0.2774 hectares per square kilometre 0.2006 hectares per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.0976 hectares per square kilometre 0.1182 hectares per square kilometre 0.0206 hectares per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.101 hectares per square kilometre 0.1037 hectares per square kilometre 0.0027 hectares per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre, Congo or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.1084 hectares per square kilometre against 0.1013 hectares per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre between Congo and Saudi Arabia?
0.0071 hectares per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Saudi Arabia rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 166th and Saudi Arabia ranks 165th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Saudi Arabia: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/saudi-arabia/">Congo vs Saudi Arabia: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.