Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre

Botswana
0.1512 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
0.1233 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
158th
Puerto Rico rank
160th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Puerto Rico
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.1512 hectares per square kilometre against 0.1233 hectares per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0279 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Botswana ranks 158th and Puerto Rico ranks 160th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 6 and Puerto Rico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1775 hectares per square kilometre 1.01 hectares per square kilometre 0.8338 hectares per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 0.2624 hectares per square kilometre 0.149 hectares per square kilometre 0.1134 hectares per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0.2626 hectares per square kilometre 0.1108 hectares per square kilometre 0.1518 hectares per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 0.2649 hectares per square kilometre 0.0427 hectares per square kilometre 0.2222 hectares per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.1837 hectares per square kilometre 0.0232 hectares per square kilometre 0.1606 hectares per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0.2292 hectares per square kilometre 0.0214 hectares per square kilometre 0.2079 hectares per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0.2301 hectares per square kilometre 0.1064 hectares per square kilometre 0.1238 hectares per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre, Botswana or Puerto Rico?
Botswana, at 0.1512 hectares per square kilometre against 0.1233 hectares per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre between Botswana and Puerto Rico?
0.0279 hectares per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Puerto Rico rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 158th and Puerto Rico ranks 160th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/botswana/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/botswana/puerto-rico-us/">Botswana vs Puerto Rico: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.