Barbados vs Solomon Islands: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre

Barbados
0.0349 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0.0517 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
170th
Solomon Islands rank
169th

Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Solomon Islands
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0.0517 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0349 hectares per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.0168 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.5 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 170th and Solomon Islands ranks 169th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9995 hectares per square kilometre 0.0111 hectares per square kilometre 0.9884 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 1.71 hectares per square kilometre 0.0448 hectares per square kilometre 1.67 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 1.91 hectares per square kilometre 0.0737 hectares per square kilometre 1.83 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 1.11 hectares per square kilometre 0.0195 hectares per square kilometre 1.09 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.2277 hectares per square kilometre 0.0301 hectares per square kilometre 0.1976 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.1372 hectares per square kilometre 0.0492 hectares per square kilometre 0.088 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.0471 hectares per square kilometre 0.0518 hectares per square kilometre 0.0047 hectares per square kilometre Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre, Barbados or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 0.0517 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0349 hectares per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre between Barbados and Solomon Islands?
0.0168 hectares per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Solomon Islands rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 170th and Solomon Islands ranks 169th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Solomon Islands: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/barbados/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/barbados/solomon-islands/">Barbados vs Solomon Islands: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.