Barbados vs New Caledonia: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre

Barbados
0.0349 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0163 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
170th
New Caledonia rank
173rd

Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • New Caledonia
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0349 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0163 hectares per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0186 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 2.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 170th and New Caledonia ranks 173rd of 181 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9995 hectares per square kilometre 0.044 hectares per square kilometre 0.9555 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 1.71 hectares per square kilometre 0.0262 hectares per square kilometre 1.69 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 1.91 hectares per square kilometre 0.0544 hectares per square kilometre 1.85 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 1.11 hectares per square kilometre 0.0222 hectares per square kilometre 1.08 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.2277 hectares per square kilometre 0.0661 hectares per square kilometre 0.1616 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.1372 hectares per square kilometre 0.0635 hectares per square kilometre 0.0737 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.0471 hectares per square kilometre 0.0387 hectares per square kilometre 0.0084 hectares per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre, Barbados or New Caledonia?
Barbados, at 0.0349 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0163 hectares per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre between Barbados and New Caledonia?
0.0186 hectares per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and New Caledonia rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 170th and New Caledonia ranks 173rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs New Caledonia: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/barbados/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-per-square-kilometre/barbados/new-caledonia/">Barbados vs New Caledonia: Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land under cereal production (hectares) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.