Iceland vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Land under cereal production (hectares), annual growth rate

Iceland
5.33 % change on previous year
in 2023
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
-71.59 % change on previous year
in 2024
Iceland rank
34th
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank
37th

Land under cereal production (hectares), annual growth rate over time

  • Iceland
  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
-50050196219932024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 5.33 % change on previous year against -71.59 % change on previous year in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 76.92 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 34th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 37th of 181 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
2010s 16.87 % change on previous year 0.8903 % change on previous year 15.98 % change on previous year Iceland
2020s 14.63 % change on previous year -1.18 % change on previous year 15.81 % change on previous year Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land under cereal production (hectares), annual growth rate, Iceland or Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
Iceland, at 5.33 % change on previous year against -71.59 % change on previous year in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
What is the difference in land under cereal production (hectares), annual growth rate between Iceland and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
76.92 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for land under cereal production (hectares), annual growth rate?
Iceland ranks 34th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 37th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land under cereal production (hectares), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Land under cereal production (hectares), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-annual-growth-rate/iceland/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-under-cereal-production-hectares-annual-growth-rate/iceland/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/">Iceland vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Land under cereal production (hectares), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land under cereal production (hectares), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,098 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Land under cereal production (hectares). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.