What is the difference in land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia and Tanzania?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Tanzania?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Europe & Central Asia vs Tanzania: Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Tanzania

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Europe & Central Asia rank

35th

Tanzania rank

38th

Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

Europe & Central Asia
Tanzania

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 11.3 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 35th and Tanzania ranks 38th of 47 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Europe & Central Asia	Tanzania	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
1970s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
1980s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
1990s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia or Tanzania?: Tanzania, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia and Tanzania?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Tanzania?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Tanzania rank globally for land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: Europe & Central Asia ranks 35th and Tanzania ranks 38th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Tanzania: Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia/tanzania/">Europe & Central Asia vs Tanzania: Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 259 places, 13,797 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Land area (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.