What is the difference in land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific and Sierra Leone?

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Sierra Leone ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Sierra Leone?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

East Asia & Pacific vs Sierra Leone: Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP

East Asia & Pacific

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Sierra Leone

0 sq. km per US$ of GDP

in 2023

East Asia & Pacific rank

38th

Sierra Leone rank

37th

Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP over time

East Asia & Pacific
Sierra Leone

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 14.5 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th and Sierra Leone ranks 37th of 47 groups.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	East Asia & Pacific	Sierra Leone	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0002 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Sierra Leone
1970s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Sierra Leone
1980s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Sierra Leone
1990s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0.0001 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Sierra Leone
2000s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Sierra Leone
2010s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Sierra Leone
2020s	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	0 sq. km per US$ of GDP	Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp, East Asia & Pacific or Sierra Leone?: Sierra Leone, at 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP against 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific and Sierra Leone?: 0 sq. km per US$ of GDP, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Sierra Leone?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Sierra Leone rank globally for land area (sq. km), per unit of gdp?: East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th and Sierra Leone ranks 37th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Sierra Leone: Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-sq-km-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific/sierra-leone/">East Asia & Pacific vs Sierra Leone: Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Land area (sq. km), per unit of GDP
Unit: sq. km per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 259 places, 13,797 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

Land area (sq. km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.