Samoa vs Zimbabwe: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre

Samoa
170.5 animals per square kilometre
in 2024
Zimbabwe
175.94 animals per square kilometre
in 2024
Samoa rank
136th
Zimbabwe rank
135th

Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre over time

  • Samoa
  • Zimbabwe
050100150200250196119922024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 175.94 animals per square kilometre against 170.5 animals per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 5.44 animals per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.

Samoa ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 135th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 163.02 animals per square kilometre 8.96 animals per square kilometre 154.05 animals per square kilometre Samoa
1970s 175.48 animals per square kilometre 13.6 animals per square kilometre 161.88 animals per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 147.53 animals per square kilometre 22.86 animals per square kilometre 124.67 animals per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 157.07 animals per square kilometre 43.98 animals per square kilometre 113.09 animals per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 196.04 animals per square kilometre 105.57 animals per square kilometre 90.47 animals per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 187.86 animals per square kilometre 141.42 animals per square kilometre 46.44 animals per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 165.18 animals per square kilometre 187.08 animals per square kilometre 21.9 animals per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre, Samoa or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 175.94 animals per square kilometre against 170.5 animals per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2024.
What is the difference in land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre between Samoa and Zimbabwe?
5.44 animals per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Samoa and Zimbabwe rank globally for land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre?
Samoa ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Zimbabwe: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-for-meat-per-square-kilometre/samoa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-for-meat-per-square-kilometre/samoa/zimbabwe/">Samoa vs Zimbabwe: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre
Unit
animals per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 11,156 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land animals slaughtered for meat divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.