Samoa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre

Samoa
170.5 animals per square kilometre
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
164.75 animals per square kilometre
in 2024
Samoa rank
136th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
138th

Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre over time

  • Samoa
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0200400600196119922024

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 170.5 animals per square kilometre against 164.75 animals per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 5.75 animals per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Samoa ranks 136th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 138th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 163.02 animals per square kilometre 231.75 animals per square kilometre 68.73 animals per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 175.48 animals per square kilometre 310 animals per square kilometre 134.52 animals per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 147.53 animals per square kilometre 498.08 animals per square kilometre 350.55 animals per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 157.07 animals per square kilometre 528.46 animals per square kilometre 371.39 animals per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 196.04 animals per square kilometre 490.38 animals per square kilometre 294.34 animals per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 187.86 animals per square kilometre 398.85 animals per square kilometre 210.99 animals per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 165.18 animals per square kilometre 143.61 animals per square kilometre 21.57 animals per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre, Samoa or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Samoa, at 170.5 animals per square kilometre against 164.75 animals per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
What is the difference in land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre between Samoa and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
5.75 animals per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Samoa and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre?
Samoa ranks 136th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 138th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-for-meat-per-square-kilometre/samoa/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-for-meat-per-square-kilometre/samoa/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Samoa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre
Unit
animals per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 11,156 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land animals slaughtered for meat divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.