Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
11.59 animals per square kilometre
in 2024
Namibia
16.03 animals per square kilometre
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
181st
Namibia rank
179th

Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Namibia
05101520196119922024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 16.03 animals per square kilometre against 11.59 animals per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 4.44 animals per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st and Namibia ranks 179th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 3.1 animals per square kilometre 0.7612 animals per square kilometre 2.34 animals per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 4.81 animals per square kilometre 1.69 animals per square kilometre 3.13 animals per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 6.22 animals per square kilometre 2.6 animals per square kilometre 3.62 animals per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 8.31 animals per square kilometre 5.56 animals per square kilometre 2.74 animals per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 10.12 animals per square kilometre 14.73 animals per square kilometre 4.61 animals per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 10.94 animals per square kilometre 16.54 animals per square kilometre 5.6 animals per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 11.56 animals per square kilometre 16.14 animals per square kilometre 4.59 animals per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
Namibia, at 16.03 animals per square kilometre against 11.59 animals per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
4.44 animals per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st and Namibia ranks 179th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-for-meat-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-for-meat-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/namibia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre
Unit
animals per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 11,156 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land animals slaughtered for meat divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.