Cape Verde vs Guinea-Bissau: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre

Cape Verde
122.08 animals per square kilometre
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
135.21 animals per square kilometre
in 2024
Cape Verde rank
145th
Guinea-Bissau rank
144th

Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Guinea-Bissau
050100150200250196119922024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 135.21 animals per square kilometre against 122.08 animals per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 13.13 animals per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 145th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 144th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 6 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 11.41 animals per square kilometre 8.57 animals per square kilometre 2.85 animals per square kilometre Cape Verde
1970s 22.01 animals per square kilometre 13.4 animals per square kilometre 8.61 animals per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 98.83 animals per square kilometre 24.26 animals per square kilometre 74.57 animals per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 147.54 animals per square kilometre 43.46 animals per square kilometre 104.09 animals per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 168.61 animals per square kilometre 73.95 animals per square kilometre 94.66 animals per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 176.08 animals per square kilometre 112.62 animals per square kilometre 63.46 animals per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 117.92 animals per square kilometre 129.92 animals per square kilometre 12.01 animals per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre, Cape Verde or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 135.21 animals per square kilometre against 122.08 animals per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2024.
What is the difference in land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre between Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
13.13 animals per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre?
Cape Verde ranks 145th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 144th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Guinea-Bissau: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-for-meat-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/land-animals-slaughtered-for-meat-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/guinea-bissau/">Cape Verde vs Guinea-Bissau: Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land animals slaughtered for meat, per square kilometre
Unit
animals per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 11,156 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Land animals slaughtered for meat divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.