China, mainland vs Southern Asia: Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per

China, mainland
96.45
in 2024
Southern Asia
89.81
in 2024
China, mainland rank
5th
Southern Asia rank
6th

Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per over time

  • China, mainland
  • Southern Asia
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922024

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 96.45 against 89.81 in Southern Asia, a difference of 6.64.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 1.1 times Southern Asia's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Southern Asia ahead.

China, mainland ranks 5th and Southern Asia ranks 6th of 23 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, mainland averaged higher in 6 and Southern Asia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Southern Asia Difference Ahead
1960s 648.33 1,045 396.51 Southern Asia
1970s 1,199 770.42 428.84 China, mainland
1980s 2,275 531.69 1,744 China, mainland
1990s 1,022 333.03 689.37 China, mainland
2000s 207.65 203.87 3.78 China, mainland
2010s 110.03 103.99 6.03 China, mainland
2020s 95.52 91.53 4 China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross per, China, mainland or Southern Asia?
China, mainland, at 96.45 against 89.81 in Southern Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross per between China, mainland and Southern Asia?
6.64, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Southern Asia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China, mainland and Southern Asia rank globally for kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — gross per?
China, mainland ranks 5th and Southern Asia ranks 6th of 23 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Southern Asia: Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/kenaf-and-other-textile-bast-fibres-raw-or-retted-gross-per-capita-production-index/china-mainland/southern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/kenaf-and-other-textile-bast-fibres-raw-or-retted-gross-per-capita-production-index/china-mainland/southern-asia/">China, mainland vs Southern Asia: Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Kenaf, and other textile bast fibres, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
45 places, 2,733 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.