Norway vs Small Island Developing States: Jute β€” Stock Variation

Norway
0 t
in 2013
Small Island Developing States
0 t
in 2013
Norway rank
3rd
Small Island Developing States rank
6th

Jute β€” Stock Variation over time

  • Norway
  • Small Island Developing States
-2.0k-1.0k01.0k2.0k196119872013

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Small Island Developing States, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Small Island Developing States ahead.

Norway ranks 3rd and Small Island Developing States ranks 6th of 46 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 2 and Small Island Developing States in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Small Island Developing States Difference Ahead
1960s -16.67 t 0 t 16.67 t Small Island Developing States
1970s -12 t 0 t 12 t Small Island Developing States
1980s 27 t 0 t 27 t Norway
1990s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”
2000s -0.6 t 0 t 0.6 t Small Island Developing States
2010s 1.5 t 0 t 1.5 t Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher jute β€” stock variation, Norway or Small Island Developing States?
Norway, at 0 t against 0 t in Small Island Developing States as of 2013.
What is the difference in jute β€” stock variation between Norway and Small Island Developing States?
0 t, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Small Island Developing States?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Norway and Small Island Developing States rank globally for jute β€” stock variation?
Norway ranks 3rd and Small Island Developing States ranks 6th of 46 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute β€” Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Small Island Developing States: Jute β€” Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-stock-variation/norway/small-island-developing-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-stock-variation/norway/small-island-developing-states/">Norway vs Small Island Developing States: Jute β€” Stock Variation</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Jute β€” Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
73 places, 3,638 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.