Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
74.64
in 2024
Uzbekistan
84.32
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
12th
Uzbekistan rank
9th

Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Uzbekistan
0200400600196119922024

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 84.32 against 74.64 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 9.68.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 9th of 14 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 233.09 239.15 6.06 Uzbekistan
2000s 143.9 122.56 21.34 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 104.27 102.09 2.17 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 78.49 87.79 9.3 Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher jute, raw or retted — gross per capita production index number, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 84.32 against 74.64 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in jute, raw or retted — gross per capita production index number between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan?
9.68, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan rank globally for jute, raw or retted — gross per capita production index number?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 9th of 14 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-raw-or-retted-gross-per-capita-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-raw-or-retted-gross-per-capita-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uzbekistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
36 places, 2,051 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.