Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
76.38
in 2024
Pakistan
87.13
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
11th
Pakistan rank
8th

Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Pakistan
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922024

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 87.13 against 76.38 in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 10.75.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Pakistan ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th and Pakistan ranks 8th of 14 groups.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 341.79 25,425 25,083 Pakistan
1980s 218.19 12,314 12,096 Pakistan
1990s 182.24 755.39 573.15 Pakistan
2000s 130.08 176.5 46.42 Pakistan
2010s 102.48 106.35 3.88 Pakistan
2020s 79.95 89.96 10 Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher jute, raw or retted — gross per capita production index number, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 87.13 against 76.38 in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in jute, raw or retted — gross per capita production index number between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
10.75, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for jute, raw or retted — gross per capita production index number?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th and Pakistan ranks 8th of 14 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-raw-or-retted-gross-per-capita-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-raw-or-retted-gross-per-capita-production-index-number-2014-2016-100/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Jute, raw or retted — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
36 places, 2,051 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.