Least Developed Countries vs Nepal: Jute — Production

Least Developed Countries
1.41 million t
in 2013
Nepal
15,500 t
in 2013
Least Developed Countries rank
6th
Nepal rank
5th

Jute — Production over time

  • Least Developed Countries
  • Nepal
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119872013

How they compare

Least Developed Countries currently reports 1.41 million t against 15,500 t in Nepal, a difference of 1.40 million t.

That makes Least Developed Countries's figure about 91.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries ranks 6th and Nepal ranks 5th of 17 groups.

Least Developed Countries has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 1.26 million t 38,133 t 1.22 million t Least Developed Countries
1970s 1.10 million t 50,435 t 1.05 million t Least Developed Countries
1980s 1.14 million t 38,465 t 1.10 million t Least Developed Countries
1990s 925,326 t 14,344 t 910,982 t Least Developed Countries
2000s 877,748 t 16,867 t 860,881 t Least Developed Countries
2010s 1.34 million t 16,327 t 1.33 million t Least Developed Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher jute — production, Least Developed Countries or Nepal?
Least Developed Countries, at 1.41 million t against 15,500 t in Nepal as of 2013.
What is the difference in jute — production between Least Developed Countries and Nepal?
1.40 million t, with Least Developed Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries and Nepal?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Least Developed Countries and Nepal rank globally for jute — production?
Least Developed Countries ranks 6th and Nepal ranks 5th of 17 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries vs Nepal: Jute — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-production/least-developed-countries/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/jute-production/least-developed-countries/nepal/">Least Developed Countries vs Nepal: Jute — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Jute — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
38 places, 1,929 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.