Caribbean vs Cuba: Jute-Like Fibres — Export Quantity
Jute-Like Fibres — Export Quantity over time
- Caribbean
- Cuba
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Cuba, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 53 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 2nd and Cuba ranks 2nd of 16 groups.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1980s | 114.3 t | 114.3 t | 0 t | — |
| 1990s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2000s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher jute-like fibres — export quantity, Caribbean or Cuba?
- Caribbean, at 0 t against 0 t in Cuba as of 2013.
- What is the difference in jute-like fibres — export quantity between Caribbean and Cuba?
- 0 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Cuba?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
- How do Caribbean and Cuba rank globally for jute-like fibres — export quantity?
- Caribbean ranks 2nd and Cuba ranks 2nd of 16 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute-Like Fibres — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.