Honduras vs Malta: Jute — Import Quantity
Jute — Import Quantity over time
- Honduras
- Malta
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 1 t against 1 t in Malta, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 90th and Malta ranks 90th of 154 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.89 t | 0 t | 1.89 t | Honduras |
| 1970s | 1.8 t | 0 t | 1.8 t | Honduras |
| 1980s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1990s | 2.7 t | 7.9 t | 5.2 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 3.7 t | 3.2 t | 0.5 t | Honduras |
| 2010s | 1 t | 4.5 t | 3.5 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher jute — import quantity, Honduras or Malta?
- Honduras, at 1 t against 1 t in Malta as of 2013.
- What is the difference in jute — import quantity between Honduras and Malta?
- 0 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Malta?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
- How do Honduras and Malta rank globally for jute — import quantity?
- Honduras ranks 90th and Malta ranks 90th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Jute — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.