Australia vs Brazil: Index of cereal production yield and land use
Australia
19.46 million
in 2024
Brazil
27.78 million
in 2024
Australia rank
7th
Brazil rank
6th
Index of cereal production yield and land use over time
- Australia
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 27.78 million against 19.46 million in Australia, a difference of 8.32 million.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.4 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.
Australia ranks 7th and Brazil ranks 6th of 186 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.75 million | 13.50 million | 2.75 million | Brazil |
| 1970s | 12.91 million | 18.97 million | 6.06 million | Brazil |
| 1980s | 15.89 million | 21.11 million | 5.22 million | Brazil |
| 1990s | 14.49 million | 18.55 million | 4.07 million | Brazil |
| 2000s | 19.13 million | 19.22 million | 81,610 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 17.88 million | 20.84 million | 2.97 million | Brazil |
| 2020s | 18.56 million | 26.71 million | 8.15 million | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher index of cereal production yield and land use, Australia or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 27.78 million against 19.46 million in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in index of cereal production yield and land use between Australia and Brazil?
- 8.32 million, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Brazil?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Brazil rank globally for index of cereal production yield and land use?
- Australia ranks 7th and Brazil ranks 6th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Index of cereal production yield and land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.